A suit filed by Glasslam against Edgetech with regards to alleged unfair trade practices – among others – has been dismissed with prejudice and each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
According to an order signed by U.S. district judge Kenneth A. Marra, the suit filed by Glasslam USA against Edgetech IG in March 2011 has been dismissed with prejudice and each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Glasslam (also known as Nebula Glass International Inc.) had alleged that Edgetech had engaged in defamation, deceptive and unfair trade practices, and breach of contract, among other allegations. Many of the allegations related to Glasslam’s entry into the warm-edge foam spacer market in 2007 with its EPD Air-Tight spacer, and Edgetech’s own warm-edge foam Super Spacer product.
The order does not specify the reason for the dismissal, but the parties had filed a joint motion just 12 days before the dismissal for extension of time to file a status report, saying that they believed the matter would be “resolved by a settlement.”